sportswriter wrote:
Gotta look ahead to 2010 ... new models (all with tubo power) looking / proposing to join the Koni Series ... fielded by pro teams who
are expected to win ... GA needs to be careful, viability / future of Koni Series at risk, protect the existing teams/ models or allow new models to come in and play, but,
at the front ??
tough decisions ....
above was posted way back in August ...
my point was to illustrate the '
grey' area involved in the rule set. There is no easy way to arrive at 'parity' among so many different MFG's in each class, each represented by front line Pro teams, some, like SpeedSource and APR for instance, who build their entire package 'in house'.
Unlike most teams who sub contract out the car build, buy their motors from say, KSE or PNA, and then prep / field their effort, these few teams do it all, chassis, suspension, motors, everything is built and developed in house. They are expecting to win, to run up front, have the MFG assisstance, the 'resources' to do so.
They are in it to win.
GA must then allow the flexibility in the rule set for these new models to be competetive, to run up front,
to win. The future of the Koni Series is riding on this flexibility. To grow the Koni Series requires new teams and MFG's to be enticed to join. No one will make the major investment of effort, time, money and their reputation to run P-5, if the rule set is restrictive in prohibiting speed or archaic in not permitting reliabilty in the drive train package.
It's all about '
clarification', defining what's acceptable, race to race, everything is "
grey", unless specifically defined in the rule set. Welcome to todays world of Pro Racing, Koni style,. can't wait for Daytona.
This post edited by sportswriter on 10-30-2009, 7:53 PM EST